Regulatory Framework

Regulatory Framework · 2.4 Substance Market Regulations

One indicator of the dimension, with the full justification of its traffic light. The bar leads to any other; at the bottom, the next one in the order of the matrix.

602.4 Substance Market Regulations

Substance Traceability

Partially meets

Partial compliance.

Mexico has a solid legal architecture for controlled-substance traceability. The General Health Law establishes controls over narcotics, psychotropics, and medicines containing them, including special prescriptions, dispensing, authorized establishments, control books, importation, exportation, and sanitary documentation. The Health Supplies Regulation complements this framework with administrative rules for establishments, prescriptions, medicine handling, and documentary records.

The most specific source in the evidence block is the Federal Law for the Control of Chemical Precursors, Essential Chemicals, and Machines for Manufacturing Capsules, Tablets, and/or Pills. This law incorporates obligations for activity reporting, operator identification, volume control, transportation, authorizations, and use of the Integrated Substances System. This shows that Mexico has not only general sanitary-control rules, but also a specific framework for tracking substances and materials linked to diversion risk.

There is also operational-programmatic evidence through COFEPRIS’s Integrated Substances System and COFEPRIS-Navy coordination. These sources document a federal platform aimed at procedures, control, registration, and surveillance of regulated substances. However, the existence of the platform is not enough to establish effective end-to-end traceability.

The indicator does not reach full compliance because the available evidence does not demonstrate verifiable national system performance. Public evidence does not confirm real coverage, data quality, inter-agency interoperability, alerts, audits, inspections, sanctions, diversion reduction, end-to-end traceability, or state-level results. Mexico City, Puebla, Oaxaca, Chiapas, and the complementary states remain territorial probatory gaps regarding Integrated Substances System performance, inspections, sanctions, alerts, and effective control.

Consequently, Mexico demonstrates an important legal and administrative basis for registering, controlling, and monitoring regulated substances, but not sufficient evidence of homogeneous, interoperable, evaluated, and effective national traceability.

Sources (6): the documents that support the traffic light
  1. NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-220-SSA1-2016, Instalación y operación de la farmacovigilancia (Document · 2017)
  2. Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión. (2026). Ley General de Salud (Legislation · 2009)
  3. Comisión Federal para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios. (2024). Marina y Cofepris impulsan el Sistema Integral de Sustancias que permite el control y vigilancia de sustancias reguladas (Report)
  4. Comisión Federal para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios. (2024). Sistema Integral de Sustancias (Regulation or programme)
  5. Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión. (2026). Ley Federal para el Control de Precursores Químicos, Productos Químicos Esenciales y Máquinas para Elaborar Cápsulas, Tabletas y/o Comprimidos (Legislation)
  6. Secretaría de Salud. Reglamento de Insumos para la Salud. (1998) (Legislation)

Links lead to the original document or to its archived copy.

Traffic light
Partially meetscoded on 15-09-2026 · Complete / validated
International support
No
Indicator score
0.50 out of a possible 1.25
Weight in the index
0.42 %
What it means
There is a framework or actions, but implementation is partial, uneven or not proven. Rules.
In the dimension
21 of 28 in Regulatory Framework. See those of Substance Market Regulations.