Differentiation Between Traffickers and Users
Partially meets the criterion.
Mexico has a legal framework that formally distinguishes between personal use, possession, and conduct associated with illicit drug trafficking. The General Health Law establishes differentiated categories and criteria related to maximum personal-use quantities, while the Federal Criminal Code defines production, transportation, trafficking, commerce, and illicit supply offences.
INEGI statistical evidence allows observation of criminal justice patterns related to retail drug offences and simple possession. However, no disaggregated judicial and prosecutorial evidence was located to verify whether the legal distinction between drug users and persons involved in trafficking is consistently applied in practice. Therefore, the criterion is partially met: a normative distinction exists, but sufficient evidence of uniform application by criminal-justice institutions remains missing.
Sources (6): the documents that support the traffic light
- CONADIC. (2019). Informe sobre la situación de las drogas en México y su atención integral (Report · 2019)
- Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión. (2026). Ley General de Salud (Legislation · 2009)
- Ley General de Salud — DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación), arts. 473 y 479 (Document · 2009)
- Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión. (2026). Código Penal Federal, artículos 194, 195 y 195 Bis (Legislation)
- Elementa DDHH. (2023). Informe para la Oficina del Alto Comisionado de Naciones Unidas sobre México (Report)
- INEGI. (2023). Estadísticas a propósito del Día Internacional de la Lucha contra el Uso Indebido y el Tráfico Ilícito de Drogas (Report)
Links lead to the original document or to its archived copy.