Tax Revenue from Recreational Cannabis
The criterion is not established by the available evidence.
Mexico recognizes a limited area of recreational cannabis self-consumption following Supreme Court decisions. This recognition removes an absolute prohibition on certain personal conduct but does not establish a regulated commercial market, production and sales licences, authorized establishments, recreational cannabis taxpayers, or a tax-collection system.
The reviewed regulatory and fiscal sources show no identifiable recreational cannabis category in the Revenue Law and no specific excise tax category in the IEPS Law. However, this absence does not prove that no potential tax obligations exist and does not measure informal activity.
No legal sales, taxable base, tax filings, VAT, income tax, excise tax, fees, or tax revenues effectively collected from a legal recreational cannabis market were identified.
The criterion is therefore not established. This conclusion reflects evidentiary insufficiency and the absence of evidence of a formal recreational cannabis fiscal market, not absolute proof that no economic activity exists.
Sources (4): the documents that support the traffic light
- Comisión Federal para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios. (2026, 7 de julio). COFEPRIS acata declaratoria de inconstitucionalidad emitida por la SCJN en materia de autoconsumo lúdico de cannabis y tetrahidrocannabinol (Report)
- Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión. (2025, 7 de noviembre). Ley de Ingresos de la Federación para el Ejercicio Fiscal de 2026 (Legislation)
- Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión. (2026). Ley del Impuesto Especial sobre Producción y Servicios; texto vigente, última reforma publicada el 7 de noviembre de 2025 y cuotas actualizadas para 2026 (Legislation)
- Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación. (2021). Declaratoria General de Inconstitucionalidad 1/2018, registro digital 30704 (Legislation)
Links lead to the original document or to its archived copy.