Proportional Penalties
Partially meets the criterion.
Mexico has a national legal framework requiring proportionality and individualized sentencing. The Constitution requires every penalty to be proportionate to the offense and the protected legal interest; the Federal Criminal Code requires consideration of culpability, harm, mode of participation, and personal circumstances; and drug-offense legislation differentiates conduct, purpose, quantity, aggravating factors, and vulnerability.
Binding precedent also establishes relevant safeguards, including the rule that an intent to produce or traffic drugs cannot be inferred automatically from quantity alone. However, no public dataset was identified that systematically links conduct, role, quantity, circumstances, imposed sentence, and appellate outcome. Normative proportionality is therefore established, but its uniform and effective application remains insufficiently demonstrated.
Sources (4): the documents that support the traffic light
- Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión. (2026). Ley General de Salud (Legislation · 2009)
- Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión. (2026). Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (Legislation)
- Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión. (2026). Código Penal Federal, artículos 194, 195 y 195 Bis (Legislation)
- Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación. (2015). Delito contra la salud en su modalidad de posesión de narcóticos: la cantidad no acredita automáticamente la finalidad exigida por el artículo 195; jurisprudencia 1a./J. 3/2015 (10a.), registro digital 2008745 (Legislation)
Links lead to the original document or to its archived copy.